DigiBouquet Editorial Policy

Content mission

DigiBouquet publishes people-first resources for readers who want help choosing digital flowers, understanding symbolism, and writing better bouquet messages. We aim to answer real gifting questions rather than produce filler pages. If an article does not help a reader decide what to send or what to say, it should not be published.

Research and sourcing

Our writers use multiple sources when preparing pages that touch on flower symbolism, etiquette, or history. These may include horticultural organizations, museum collections, floristry references, and established cultural background materials. We summarize those sources in plain language and adapt them for the specific use case of digital gifting.

Because flower symbolism varies by region and tradition, we avoid presenting symbolic meanings as universal facts. When meanings differ, we prefer wording such as "commonly associated with" or "often used to express" rather than making absolute claims.

Human review

Every article is reviewed by a human editor before publication. Review focuses on four checks:

1. Accuracy of the main claims and whether the page overstates uncertain symbolism
2. Practical usefulness of the recommendations, examples, and bouquet combinations
3. Internal consistency with the current DigiBouquet product experience
4. Clarity of structure, including whether readers can quickly act on the guidance

Use of AI on DigiBouquet

The flower and petal visuals used in the DigiBouquet product are AI-generated images. We disclose that clearly on the site. Our educational content, however, is not published automatically. Drafting assistance may be used during content preparation, but all articles are reviewed, revised, and approved by a human editor before going live. We do not publish raw machine-generated pages without editorial review.

Updates and freshness

We update an article when one of the following is true:

• The page no longer reflects the current DigiBouquet product or bouquet creation flow
• A clearer example, better table, or more useful message set would materially improve the page
• A reader reports a factual issue or wording that could mislead
• We expand a topic to better cover a common user question

Each page displays publication and update dates so readers can judge freshness for themselves.

Corrections

If we learn that a claim is inaccurate, we correct the page as soon as practical and update the modification date. For issues that affect the main recommendation of a page, we prioritize the correction ahead of minor wording changes. Readers can report concerns through the contact page.

Commercial independence

Editorial content is written to help readers, not to inflate page count. We do not create pages solely to host advertising. The bouquet builder and the blog are related parts of the same site, but blog recommendations are expected to remain useful even without any conversion to the product experience.